data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ab87/9ab874e6fafdc61ea3994e1eecf5c30e7e63c1fd" alt="Sony spectralayers pro 3 vs izotope rx 4"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e71c2/e71c2b4af00f899ee131f46ffe3e9daa81485bb4" alt="sony spectralayers pro 3 vs izotope rx 4 sony spectralayers pro 3 vs izotope rx 4"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4fa5/f4fa5bff6d086e31ff03302fe7182afb5b0a8a27" alt="sony spectralayers pro 3 vs izotope rx 4 sony spectralayers pro 3 vs izotope rx 4"
I'm keen to hear from anyone who might have used SpectraLayers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e655/2e655fcf1bd425111395ea1756e11c805ced3ac3" alt="sony spectralayers pro 3 vs izotope rx 4 sony spectralayers pro 3 vs izotope rx 4"
It seems to feature the same spectral editing functionality as RX. I'm now looking to but a spectral editing tool, and have seen that Steinberg offer SpectraLayers - which integrates with ARA within Cubase for seamless editing. It even worked for exposed acoustic piano, which was very pleasing. Regardless Soundforge customers might have recently migrated to IZotope's Ozone (helped by big introductory offers) or Spectralayers users might have gone to utilize iZotope's RX, They might very well happily return if Magix provides what iZotope has not been able to, these years. We were able to us its spectral editing to pull out specific unwanted sounds, without and perceptible harm to the actual audio we wanted to keep. We used iZotope RX for a few months using a rental option, and the results were very good. These noises can be anything from cars passing, or birds tweeting - through to (sometimes) aircraft overhead. We are doing a lot of recording on-site (usually of solo piano, or piano with one other instrument) in locations where there are ambient noises.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ab87/9ab874e6fafdc61ea3994e1eecf5c30e7e63c1fd" alt="Sony spectralayers pro 3 vs izotope rx 4"